TOKENOMICS

Elon owns 13% of Tesla and 42% of Space X, Bezos owns 9% of Amazon, Zuck owns 14% of Meta, Ellison owns 41% of Oracle, Arnault owns over 50% of LVMH. And you think giving the founder 2% or less of token supply on launch is enough incentive to keep them incentivized long term? lmao

You’re absolutely right—comparing traditional equity stakes to token allocations highlights a critical issue. In established companies, founders like Elon, Bezos, or Zuck hold significant percentages because their ownership is meant to reflect both their risk and their ongoing contributions. But tokenomics can sometimes fall into a trap: if a fair launch model only allocates around 2% at TGE, it doesn’t provide the necessary skin in the game for founders and early contributors over the long term.

But here’s our approach:

We believe that founders and teams should be rewarded in a way that mirrors their commitment and the value they help create, much like in traditional equity models. Therefore, rather than sticking to a barebones fair launch that dilutes the team to 2% or less, we propose a balanced model where:

Team & Treasury Allocation (30-40%): This sizable pool is reserved for the team and future development. It’s not handed out all at once but is subject to a vesting schedule (for example, a 12-month cliff followed by gradual unlocks over 3–4 years) that ensures ongoing commitment and aligns incentives with the project’s success.

Community & Public Allocation (50-60%): While this gives everyone a fair chance to participate, it’s designed so that the team isn’t left short-changed.

Ecosystem & Strategic Partnerships (10-20%): These tokens will help us build partnerships and support initiatives that drive long-term value for everyone involved.

In essence:

Even if the team’s immediate TGE allocation appears low, the total package—when accounting for vesting and additional performance-related unlocks—ensures that founders have a meaningful, long-term stake in the project. This mirrors the traditional model where the founders’ equity might seem modest at first glance but ultimately translates into substantial ownership as the company grows.


1. Purpose & Philosophy

We believe in giving everyone a chance to participate—just like in a fair launch—but we also recognize that building world-changing technology requires sustained resources. Therefore, our model blends community fairness with long-term operational funding.

2. Token Allocation

Team & Treasury (30-40%)

Why? Unlike pure fair launches where teams get 5-15%, we reserve a substantial share to ensure the team has the operational firepower to build, scale, and navigate challenges.

How? These tokens will be subject to a vesting schedule (e.g., a 12-month cliff followed by gradual release over 3–4 years) to align incentives and ensure commitment.

Community & Public Sale (50-60%)

Why? This is the spirit of fair launch: enabling broad participation.

How? Tokens will be made available to the community through a transparent public sale or distribution event. To prevent market manipulation, the release into liquidity will be carefully scheduled and possibly integrated with staking or reward mechanisms.

Ecosystem & Strategic Partnerships (10-20%)

Why? To fund future developments, strategic collaborations, and open-source contributions that benefit the entire ecosystem.

How? These tokens are earmarked for initiatives that build long-term value and sustainable growth, ensuring a win–win for developers and community members alike.

3. Liquidity & Market Stability

Controlled Liquidity Release:

Why? Unrestricted liquidity can lead to whales dumping large amounts of tokens, causing dramatic price swings.

How? We’ll implement mechanisms like liquidity locks and staggered token release. For instance, initial liquidity pools can be locked for a set period and additional liquidity can be added gradually.

Anti-Dumping Measures:

Why? To protect both the project and its holders from abrupt market crashes.

How? Design mechanisms (such as vesting for early investors and smart contract-based liquidity management) that prevent sudden, large-scale token exits.

4. Legal & Regulatory Considerations

Pre-Launch Compliance:

Why? Retrofitting legal structures post-launch can be time-consuming and expensive.

How? We will establish a clear legal framework (e.g., setting up a token foundation or an onshore development company) and consult with legal experts well in advance.

Future-Proofing:

Why? Anticipating legal changes avoids costly, reactive adjustments.

How? Continuous monitoring of regulatory landscapes and maintaining open communication with stakeholders will be integral to our strategy.

5. Incentivizing Builders & the Community

Fair Rewards for All:

Why? Traditional fair launches often favor those with immediate capital.

How? Our plan includes staking rewards and governance participation benefits that ensure long-term rewards for both early builders and community members.

Sustainable Open-Source Support:

Why? Open-source projects are frequently exploited without adequately supporting the creators.

How? Allocating a portion of tokens to a dedicated open-source fund ensures contributors are fairly compensated and remain motivated to drive continuous innovation.

In Summary

Our tokenomics plan is built on a dual commitment:

Community Fairness: Everyone has access to a public token sale, enabling broad participation.

Operational Sustainability: The team and ecosystem receive sufficient resources through reserved tokens, vesting schedules, and controlled liquidity measures.

This model mitigates common pitfalls—like liquidity manipulation, unrealistic expectations from traders, and legal retrofits—while ensuring that both early builders and the community can thrive together over the long term.